You know how sometimes you completely disagree with people, but you still enjoy reading what they write? Well, case and point.. I was bored to-day, and I paid a visit to Richard Dawkins’ official website. Well, despite having a different ideology from the guy, I find him clever and not difficult to read/listen to/watch. After browsing the site (Check my Tumblog for a sort of funny picture I found), I found myself really interested in his blog.
The payoff for bin Laden has been mayhem and chaos, costly delays and maddening inconvenience to millions of travellers, in every hour of every day, in every airport of every country (except some third world ones with the good sense to ignore the whole charade). Those useless plastic knives and forks were nothing but a signal to the home electorate: We’re gonna kick some ass, and these plastic knives show it, you better believe it. And did some bearded loon once pack explosives into his shoes? Right then, we’ll show those folks we mean business. We’ll smoke ‘em out and teach those terrists who rules this town, yessirree. From now on nobody – and ah mean nobody – boards a plane without first removing their shoes, whenever they board a plane anywhere – and ah mean anywhere – in God’s own country.
Firstly, I’m dying to hear a Dawkins Southern accent. It’d just be humourous to see that little grey-haired man dressed in his sweater break out into some good ‘ol country speak. That aside, I was a bit troubled. I expect my grandparents to complain about taking their shoes off at the airport (should they ever visit the United States), but that’s mostly because old people, understandably, smell badly in general and removing one’s shoes can be a bit embarrassing because of it. I’m straying from this point though. I mean to say that complaining about a country’s “security” measures is something that we all do..young and old. The only difference is that Dawkins is sort of putting the cherry on top by suggesting that this is a result of god– not incompetence in America’s foreign policy.
Sure, you may say that religion does play a role in this and I wholeheartedly agree. But, to what point? To the point where we can use god as an excuse for every bad thing that humans do? We humans, as complex and wonderfully sophisticated as we are, aren’t perfect. We hurt people in the name of power, greed, anger..the list goes on. So how much of this is related to believing in something supernatural?
I can’t really answer that and neither can anyone else. All I can put forth is that religion is used as an excuse on both sides. It’s used by Islamic extremists to coerce young men into radical behaviour. It’s used by evangelical Christians to secularise and radicalise parts of the country. It’s even used by authors, Dawkins included, who want to push an agenda as far as they can. The thing that all of these people have in common is that they’re trying to breed a revolution. Dawkins wants people to believe that a world without god would be peaceful and happy. Terrorists want to believe that a world without Western powers would be peaceful and happy. Christians, same thing. It’s the “salvation” belief.
I’m in no way saying that Dawkins is deserving of being compared to terrorists, but I’m saying that the same method exists in what he says. “Well, maybe, but he’s not telling people to go out and hurt others!” Of course, but that’s what the Atheist movement is lacking.. a plan of action. The current plan of action is to just hope that people on YouTube watch some videos and subscribe to this ideology? That people in bookstores read his book and their “eyes become opened”?
Well, here’s the sad fact: it almost doesn’t even matter if you read books or not. People will be sheep– even in the name of almighty science. It all depends on social needs, self-esteem needs, etc. Does this lead down the road to Maslow’s self-actualisation hierarchy? You know, not always. Religious people and Atheists alike..there are people who are just content with feeling superior. Lots of them.